Armadillo Technical Institute Other School
106 Rose St
Phoenix OR, 97535, Jackson County
Phone: 541-535-3287
| Ranking: | High School:  (266 out of 279, bottom 5%)Elementary/Middle School: (957 out of 958, bottom 0%)* |
Type: Regular Other School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 12
School District: Phoenix-Talent School District 4
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 6 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 78 | 93 | 103 | 109 | 112 | 107 | 116 | |||||||
| Grade 6: | 2 | 2.6% | 3 | 3.2% | 2 | 1.9% | 1 | 0.9% | 1 | 0.9% | 3 | 2.8% | 1 | 0.9% |
| Grade 7: | 9 | 11.5% | 3 | 3.2% | 6 | 5.8% | 7 | 6.4% | 11 | 9.8% | 4 | 3.7% | 7 | 6.0% |
| Grade 8: | 5 | 6.4% | 9 | 9.7% | 12 | 11.7% | 10 | 9.2% | 7 | 6.3% | 8 | 7.5% | 9 | 7.8% |
| Grade 9: | 8 | 10.3% | 12 | 12.9% | 13 | 12.6% | 17 | 15.6% | 19 | 17.0% | 13 | 12.1% | 17 | 14.7% |
| Grade 10: | 14 | 17.9% | 16 | 17.2% | 22 | 21.4% | 17 | 15.6% | 21 | 18.8% | 23 | 21.5% | 31 | 26.7% |
| Grade 11: | 23 | 29.5% | 21 | 22.6% | 22 | 21.4% | 20 | 18.3% | 13 | 11.6% | 30 | 28.0% | 24 | 20.7% |
| Grade 12: | 17 | 21.8% | 29 | 31.2% | 26 | 25.2% | 37 | 33.9% | 40 | 35.7% | 26 | 24.3% | 27 | 23.3% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 48 | 61.5% | 60 | 64.5% | 68 | 66.0% | 57 | 52.3% | 54 | 48.2% | 45 | 42.1% | 57 | 49.1% |
| Female: | 30 | 38.5% | 33 | 35.5% | 35 | 34.0% | 52 | 47.7% | 41 | 36.6% | 37 | 34.6% | 41 | 35.3% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 1.3% | 3 | 3.2% | 2 | 1.9% | 1 | 0.9% | 4 | 3.6% | 4 | 3.7% | 5 | 4.3% |
| Asian: | 2 | 2.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.9% |
| Hispanic: | 11 | 14.1% | 11 | 11.8% | 18 | 17.5% | 21 | 19.3% | 11 | 9.8% | 7 | 6.5% | 6 | 5.2% |
| Black: | 2 | 2.6% | 1 | 1.1% | 1 | 1.0% | 2 | 1.8% | 3 | 2.7% | 2 | 1.9% | 2 | 1.7% |
| White: | 51 | 65.4% | 71 | 76.3% | 74 | 71.8% | 77 | 70.6% | 85 | 75.9% | 77 | 72.0% | 88 | 75.9% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 11 | 14.1% | 7 | 7.5% | 8 | 7.8% | 8 | 7.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 35 | 44.9% | 37 | 39.8% | 51 | 49.5% | 54 | 49.5% | 66 | 58.9% | 45 | 42.1% | 41 | 35.3% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.1% | 5 | 4.9% | 6 | 5.5% | 5 | 4.5% | 5 | 4.7% | 2 | 1.7% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.00 | 25.14 | 15.15 | 14.16 | 14.55 | 13.90 | 14.50 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| OAKS | ||||||
| 2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | < 5.0% | 35.2% | 43.2% |
| 2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 25% | 41.1% | 46.6% |
| 2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 26.3% | 36.3% | 45% |
| 2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 23.1% | 40.8% | 55% |
| 2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 25% | 46.9% | 52% |
| 2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | < 5.0% | 45.8% | 54% |
| 2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 5.9% | 42.2% | 53.6% |
| 2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 15.4% | 56.3% | 68% |
| 2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 19% | 57.2% | 66% |
| 2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 20.6% | 65.3% | 69% |
| 2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 45.8% | 50.5% |
| 2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 12.5% | 50.8% | 53.5% |
| 2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 35% | 46.8% | 55% |
| 2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 52.6% | 66% |
| 2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 45.5% | 64.8% | 65% |
| 2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 64.8% | 66% |
| 2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 55% | 65.5% | 66.1% |
| 2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 81.7% | 83% |
| 2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 76.6% | 84% |
| 2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 81.4% | 85% |
| 2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 28.6% | 60.4% | 60.5% |
| 2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.6% | 60.9% | 62% |
| 2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 11.1% | 54.2% | 58% |
| 2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 7.7% | 44.4% | N/A |
| 2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 27.3% | 64.8% | 70% |
| 2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 38.1% | 47.8% | 64% |
| 2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 51.9% | 63% |
| 2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 40% | 44.7% | 48% |
| 2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 68.1% | 55% |
| 2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 30% | 36.1% | 55% |
| 2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 8.3% | 38.3% | 53.1% |
| 2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.6% | 55.9% | 68% |
| 2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 51.1% | 67% |
| 2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 25.0% | 55.5% | 60% |
| 2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 50% | 61.9% | 73% |
| 2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 50% | 70.7% | 77% |
| 2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | < 5.0% | 54.1% | 65% |
| 2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 57.1% | 71% |
| 2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 25% | 61.5% | 74% |
| 2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 76.4% | 77.8% |
| 2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 51.2% | 61% |
| 2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | < 5.0% | 44.2% | 63% |
| 2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 75.8% | 73% |
| 2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 55.6% | 69.4% | 77% |
| 2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 72.4% | 77.3% |
| 2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60% | 75.6% | 80% |
| 2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 71.6% | 75% |
| 2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 40% | 45.9% | 59.8% |
| 2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 9.1% | 47.9% | 63.5% |
| 2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 17.6% | 55.6% | 66% |
| 2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 20% | 59% | 70% |
| 2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 20% | 58.6% | 69% |
| 2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 22.2% | 59.6% | 71% |
| 2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 8.3% | 63.8% | 70.6% |
| 2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 7.1% | 69.9% | 65% |
| 2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 60.1% | 65% |
| 2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | < 5.0% | 53.1% | 63% |
| 2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 55.6% | 56.9% | 60% |
| 2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 8.3% | 51% | 62.5% |
| 2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 23.5% | 65.1% | 66% |
| 2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 67% | 69% |
| 2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 27.3% | 70.7% | 65% |
| 2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 59.3% | 70% |
| 2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 65.1% | 69.5% |
| 2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 30.8% | 72% | 72% |
| 2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 60.6% | 68% |
| 2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 30.0% | 59.2% | 67% |
| 2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 20% | 43.3% | 59% |
| 2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 62% | 68% |
| 2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 22.2% | 58.6% | 72% |
| 2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 61.8% | 70.8% |
| 2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 15.4% | 65.7% | 71% |
| 2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 29.4% | 62.8% | 66% |
| 2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 22.2% | 62.4% | 66% |
| 2004 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 10% | 31.7% | 37.2% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Armadillo Technical Institute Other School was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.