Philip R. Smith School
949 Avery St South Windsor CT, 06074, Hartford County Phone: 860-648-5025 Ranking: (247 out of 765, top 32%)* Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 5 School District: South Windsor School District Title I Eligible School: No Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 26 | 25 | 23 | 25 | 22 | 26 | 27 | |||||||
Total Students: | 352 | 343 | 332 | 342 | 360 | 415 | 436 | |||||||
Kindergarten: | 48 | 13.6% | 33 | 9.6% | 52 | 15.7% | 44 | 12.9% | 46 | 12.8% | 55 | 13.3% | 65 | 14.9% |
Grade 1: | 42 | 11.9% | 65 | 19.0% | 59 | 17.8% | 55 | 16.1% | 53 | 14.7% | 69 | 16.6% | 49 | 11.2% |
Grade 2: | 64 | 18.2% | 68 | 19.8% | 56 | 16.9% | 54 | 15.8% | 66 | 18.3% | 47 | 11.3% | 74 | 17.0% |
Grade 3: | 71 | 20.2% | 58 | 16.9% | 56 | 16.9% | 63 | 18.4% | 46 | 12.8% | 80 | 19.3% | 72 | 16.5% |
Grade 4: | 60 | 17.0% | 60 | 17.5% | 61 | 18.4% | 46 | 13.5% | 77 | 21.4% | 69 | 16.6% | 91 | 20.9% |
Grade 5: | 67 | 19.0% | 59 | 17.2% | 48 | 14.5% | 79 | 23.1% | 70 | 19.4% | 93 | 22.4% | 83 | 19.0% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 172 | 48.9% | 178 | 51.9% | 172 | 51.8% | 186 | 54.4% | 182 | 50.6% | 212 | 51.1% | 222 | 50.9% |
Female: | 180 | 51.1% | 165 | 48.1% | 160 | 48.2% | 156 | 45.6% | 170 | 47.2% | 195 | 47.0% | 210 | 48.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 79 | 22.4% | 65 | 19.0% | 43 | 13.0% | 47 | 13.7% | 40 | 11.1% | 41 | 9.9% | 46 | 10.6% |
Hispanic: | 16 | 4.5% | 15 | 4.4% | 18 | 5.4% | 17 | 5.0% | 19 | 5.3% | 20 | 4.8% | 19 | 4.4% |
Black: | 18 | 5.1% | 19 | 5.5% | 17 | 5.1% | 24 | 7.0% | 25 | 6.9% | 27 | 6.5% | 24 | 5.5% |
White: | 233 | 66.2% | 243 | 70.8% | 254 | 76.5% | 254 | 74.3% | 276 | 76.7% | 327 | 78.8% | 347 | 79.6% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 5 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 12 | 3.4% | 13 | 3.8% | 14 | 4.2% | 19 | 5.6% | 12 | 3.3% | 14 | 3.4% | 8 | 1.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 6 | 1.7% | 5 | 1.5% | 3 | 0.9% | 5 | 1.5% | 11 | 3.1% | 4 | 1.0% | 5 | 1.1% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.64 | 13.94 | 14.25 | 13.82 | 16.36 | 17.70 | 16.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CMT | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 88% | 78.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 87.8% | 80.1% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 87.5% | 80.7% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 89.9% | 82.8% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 88.4% | 83.6% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81% | 89.8% | 84.3% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.3% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 91.7% | 82.7% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92% | 80.9% | 69.2% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 81.3% | 69.3% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 77.6% | 68.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 81.9% | 71.1% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 77.9% | 72.3% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 81.9% | 74% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 87.8% | 74.5% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 85.5% | 72.4% |
2006 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 87.3% | 81.7% |
2007 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 89.5% | 82.4% |
2008 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90% | 88.9% | 82.9% |
2009 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91% | 92.4% | 83.2% |
2010 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 84% | 80.3% |
2011 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.3% | 85.6% | 81.1% |
2012 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 92.3% | 83.2% |
2013 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 85.9% | 80.4% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 89.2% | 80.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 90.1% | 80.9% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 92.5% | 81.5% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 93.9% | 84.6% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 87% | 94.8% | 85.2% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.7% | 85.2% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 93.9% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 94.0% | 83.8% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 82.1% | 71.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 81.3% | 70.6% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 83.6% | 69.7% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 88% | 74.4% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 86.1% | 72.9% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 86.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 91% | 78.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 89.3% | 77.6% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 91.8% | 84.2% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 90.1% | 84.1% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 92.5% | 84.8% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 92.9% | 85% |
2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 92.7% | 86.5% |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 91.8% | 85.4% |
2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 90.9% | 83.7% |
2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 93.5% | 83.5% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 91.9% | 80.8% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 89.5% | 82.5% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 91.5% | 83.1% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 94.6% | 85.9% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94.9% | 87.8% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 96.6% | 87.6% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 95.5% | 85.7% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 95.5% | 84.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 85.3% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 85.9% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 85.4% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 91.7% | 77.7% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 87.2% | 75.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 88.9% | 75.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.6% | 79.7% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 94.5% | 79.1% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 92.1% | 81.1% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95% | 82.9% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 92.8% | 82.5% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 96.2% | 82.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 92.5% | 82.4% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 94.2% | 81.7% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 93.1% | 85.3% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.4% | 85.7% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 95.9% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 96.4% | 86.5% |
2010 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 95.3% | 87.3% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 95.4% | 88% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 96.6% | 88.5% |
2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 95.1% | 87.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Philip R. Smith School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.